Cancer is a genetic disease.
When actress Angelina Jolie went influential about her inhibiting clone mastectomy, it did not persuade to an increased understanding of the genetic risk of heart cancer, researchers say. Although it raised awareness of soul cancer, exposure to Jolie's outline may have resulted in greater confusion about the relationship between a family history of breast cancer and increased cancer risk, according to the study, published Dec 19, 2013 in the memoir Genetics in Medicine venapro. Earlier this year, Jolie revealed that she had both breasts removed after erudition that she carried a modification in a gene called BRCA1 that is linked to teat and ovarian cancers.
Women with mutations in that gene and the BRCA2 gene have a five times higher endanger of core cancer and a 10 to 30 times higher chance of developing ovarian cancer than those without the mutations. For the study, researchers surveyed more than 2500 Americans. About 75 percent were posted of Jolie's story, the investigators found day 4rx. But fewer than 10 percent of the respondents could correctly response questions about the BRCA gene variant that Jolie carries and the ordinary woman's peril of developing mamma cancer.
So "Ms Jolie's healthfulness copy was prominently featured throughout the media and was a inadvertent to organize salubrity communicators and educators to educate about the nuanced issues around genetic testing, danger and preventive surgery," study starring role author Dina Borzekowski, a research professor in the University of Maryland School of Public Health's domain of behavior and community health, said in a university announcement release herbal a. However, it "feels be partial to it was a missed time to educate the civil about a complex but rare health situation".
About half of the examine respondents incorrectly thought that a paucity of family history of cancer was associated with a reduce than average personal risk. Among race who had at least one close relative develop cancer, those who knew about Jolie's live were less likely than those ignorant of her story to estimate their own cancer gamble as higher than average, 39 percent versus 59 percent. That's a concern, another researcher said.
And "Since many more women without a ancestry curriculum vitae age breast cancer each year than those with, it is critical that women don't feel falsely reassured by a cold family history," haunt co-author Dr Debra Roter, commander of the Center for Genomic Literacy and Communication at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, said in the dope release. The researchers also found that 57 percent of women who knew about Jolie's myth said they would have like surgery if they knew they had a imperfect BRCA gene.
Nearly three-quarters of women and men in the appraisal felt Jolie did the dextral phobia by going public about her experience. Cases of knocker cancer linked to a BRCA gene metamorphosis are extremely rare. In the United States, a woman's jeopardize of ever getting breast cancer if she does not have a BRCA transfiguring is between 5 percent and 15 percent bestvito.eu. While celebrities can employee prompt awareness of health issues by sharing their own experiences, it's urgent to help the clientele understand and use the information about diagnosis and treatment contained in these stories, the researchers concluded.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий